hatman: HatMan, my alter ego and face on the 'net (Default)
([personal profile] hatman Mar. 8th, 2009 10:46 pm)
Hypothetical situation:

There's a spiffy new electric shaver on the market. You get one for the household, and you're set. Men use it to shave their faces, which requires that the shaving heads be in the concave position. Women use it to shave their legs, which requires that the heads be in the convex position. However, they also, every once in a while, use it to shave their underarms, which requires the heads to be in the concave position. A quick glance tells you what position it's in, and the flick of a switch easily changes it from one to the other.

A woman shaves her legs and puts the shaver away. She uses it both ways, and there's no telling who will want it next. She leaves the heads as they are.

Later, a man comes to use it and finds it in the "wrong" position. "Hey!" he shouts. "You left the shaver convex! Again! Why can't you ever put it back the right way?"

How does the woman respond?

A: "I'm sorry. I know you like it convex. I'll try to remember next time."

B: "So? Are you a baby? Flick the switch. It's not that hard. Takes half a second. How lazy can you be?"

Think about it for a sec.

And then tell me...

What the heck is the big deal about the toilet seat?
ext_3159: HatMan (Default)

From: [identity profile] pgwfolc.livejournal.com


Right. No one wants to touch it. So why should the man be the one to always have to?

But yeah, the particles into the air thing is rather squicky. I don't think it's very many, and bathrooms are prone to icky growths anyway (they're dark and damp, contain stagnant water, and are gathering places for dirt - such as whatever you touch before you finish washing your hands), but there is something to be said for not adding to that. It's the one argument I've heard that actually holds some water. So to speak.

From: [identity profile] un-sedentary.livejournal.com


You're right, the man shouldn't always have to. I don't really see this as a big deal either - I wouldn't get riled up if the toilet seat was up since it takes a second to put it down and I'm going to wash my hands anyway.

From: [identity profile] schnuffichen.livejournal.com


Right. No one wants to touch it. So why should the man be the one to always have to?

Because he's the only one needing it up? Why should I touch it when I'm not the reason for all of this?
If you don't want to touch the toilet seat (which is quite understandable), leave it down and sit down ;)
ext_3159: HatMan (Default)

From: [identity profile] pgwfolc.livejournal.com


But... that's unnatural. And icky. And stuff. Guys don't do that. Really, would you sit on a toilet seat if you didn't have to? (Especially if not doing so meant that you didn't have to get halfway undressed, too...)

Really, flipping the seat is not a big deal. I'll do it when I need to. But you're a big girl. Why can't you do it, too? Without complaining.
.

Profile

hatman: HatMan, my alter ego and face on the 'net (Default)
hatman

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags