(no subject)
Strike begins in just over 2 hours!
Read my [blog]! No new [content]! (For the next 24 hours.)
Quick review, for those still confused (and I can't blame you, given how sparse some of the "informational" posts have been):
LJ has been treating its users poorly of late. Starting with Strikethrough and the way they handled it, continuing with certain policy changes and such, all the way up through their recent decision to get rid of Basic accounts.
There's a bit more information here, and a (translated) excerpt from an interview with the guy in charge.
All you have to do is not use LJ for 24 hours. No new posts, no new comments... don't even open the site. (Though you can post now to say you'll be participating.)
The idea is to make that point that we're not just customers. We're content providers. Without us, there is no site, and thus nowhere to put ads and no one to look at them. The idea and execution aren't perfect, but... it's worth a try.
Read my [blog]! No new [content]! (For the next 24 hours.)
Quick review, for those still confused (and I can't blame you, given how sparse some of the "informational" posts have been):
LJ has been treating its users poorly of late. Starting with Strikethrough and the way they handled it, continuing with certain policy changes and such, all the way up through their recent decision to get rid of Basic accounts.
There's a bit more information here, and a (translated) excerpt from an interview with the guy in charge.
All you have to do is not use LJ for 24 hours. No new posts, no new comments... don't even open the site. (Though you can post now to say you'll be participating.)
The idea is to make that point that we're not just customers. We're content providers. Without us, there is no site, and thus nowhere to put ads and no one to look at them. The idea and execution aren't perfect, but... it's worth a try.
no subject
i actually dont entirely agree that livejournal is in the wrong. but i'm kinda in the middle, so i figured i'd throw my support on the side of the locals.
no subject
Eventually, they admitted the mistake and reinstated some of the accounts, but not nearly all. And even that was handled poorly.
There have been other similarly big screw-ups since, but I don't remember the whole history.
Of course, you get people who complain too much about it and make these melodramatic and hyperbolic claims, but that doesn't change the fact that there were some pretty big problems (even if not as big as some would make them out to be).
no subject
no subject
no subject